16 and 19 year old dating uk
To establish a suitable measure of DRV, this article considers the prevalence of different forms of DRV within a relationship, together with the severity and frequency of these behaviours, relative to young people in England and Wales.In this context, less severe behaviours occurring only once may not be considered to constitute DRV whereas other, more serious behaviours happening even once may be sufficient to warrant DRV classification.This article provides the first comprehensive estimate of the distribution of dating and relationship violence and of risk and variation of DRV according to socio-demographic and behavioural factors with a large sample of FE students in England and Wales.Establishing the association between socio-demographic, contextual and behavioural characteristics with DRV will help to inform whether universal or targeted interventions are appropriate.There are now more than 1.5 million young people aged 16–19 studying in FE, with increasing participation across all social groups.They are environments where young people are socialized into gender norms and where significant amounts of gender-based harassment and DRV go unchallenged.Among females, 46.1% experienced controlling behaviours and 31.6% threatening behaviours; 49.9% of males experienced controlling behaviours, 27.1% threatening behaviours and 5.8% online sexual violence.The odds of DRV victimization were 2–8 times greater for males and 2–4 times greater for females who had ever sent a sexually explicit image.
The evidence is mixed as to whether certain socio-demographic characteristics and dating and relationship behaviours are associated with more experience of DRV.
= 3) between September and December 2015, as part of a mixed method, multi-case study to inform the development of a sex and relationships intervention for FE settings.
Settings were purposively recruited to reflect different institutional contexts within the sector: two ‘sixth form’ colleges attached to schools (England 1000 students.
Evidence of associations between socio-demographic factors and adolescent DRV victimization is equivocal, with most studies undertaken in North America.
A review of 61 studies reported lower socio-economic status (SES) was associated with an increased risk for DRV victimization.